AI Music Gets Caught in a Sticky Copyright Web: Major Labels Sue Udio and Suno

udio suno

AI Music Gets Caught in a Sticky Copyright Web: Major Labels Sue Udio and Suno

The world of AI music generation is facing a major test as two industry leaders, Udio and Suno, find themselves entangled in a copyright lawsuit brought on by a force to be reckoned with: the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), representing music giants like Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment, and Warner Music Group.

The RIAA alleges that Udio and Suno’s AI models, designed to churn out fresh melodies and sonic textures, have indulged in too much “borrowing” – allegedly lifting material from copyrighted songs to fuel their creative fires. This act, according to the RIAA, constitutes blatant copyright infringement.

“The music community welcomes AI with open arms,” Mitch Glazier, CEO of the RIAA, states. “We actively collaborate with responsible developers who prioritize human creativity and empower artists and songwriters.” However, Glazier emphasizes the need for ethical boundaries. “Unlicensed services like Udio and Suno claiming it’s ‘fair use’ to exploit an artist’s life work for profit without permission stifle the potential of truly innovative AI for everyone.”

The accused companies are singing a different tune. Mikey Shulman, CEO of Suno, maintains that their mission is “to democratize music creation for all.” He argues that their technology generates entirely new outputs, not cheap imitations. “We explicitly disallow user prompts referencing specific artists,” Shulman highlights. “We were eager to explain this to the labels, but instead of dialogue, they’ve opted for legal action.”

Udio echoes a similar sentiment, defending their technology as a tool for learning musical concepts, not copying copyrighted material. “Generative AI models learn by example, just like students studying music scores,” their statement reads. “Our goal is to understand musical building blocks, which aren’t owned by anyone.” However, the RIAA counters this argument, claiming evidence of Suno “memorizing and regurgitating” existing recordings. Additionally, the RIAA interprets Udio’s statement as a concerning admission of potentially “illegal and unethical conduct.”

This lawsuit follows Sony Music’s warnings to over 700 AI developers, fiercely guarding their artists’ work from unauthorized use in AI training. The message is clear: the music industry is ready to fight for its intellectual property in the age of artificial intelligence.

The outcome of this legal battle will have significant ramifications for the future of AI music generation. Will we see a future where AI and human creativity collaborate seamlessly, or will copyright concerns clip the wings of this nascent technology? Only time and the courts will tell.


You may also like...

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.